Unnecessary charges on bill
My 1997 Toyota Landcruiser was using an excessive amount of oil. I delivered it to Martins for inspection. I was informed the PVC system may be the cause. The other possibility was it may need a valve job and this would be worth a try versus spending thousands of dollars. I totally agreed. When i picked up the vehicle i was told of the repairs and told that a quart of oil had been added as it was low. When they said this I thought to myself I had just added 2/3 of a quart immediately before i delivered the vehicle to them. Well it was only $3.95 and I did not want to be petty over such a small thing so I let it go. Over the next several days I kept thinking about it and thought if they will cheat on that what else would they do. I decided to inspect the new PVC valve and see if it was new. Upon inspection it did not look new but I was unsure. I decided to get another opinion and asked a friend who was a Master Mechanic for Honda Motors. He thought the valve was not new. That still did not prove anything so I decided to go to the Toyota Dealership and purchase a new valve from them. The new part could not have been differant. Martins claimed they had purchased the valve from the same dealership. I took digital pictures of both valves so you be the judge. Maybe the valve is new as they claim, no one will ever no for sure but them. One thing I am absolutely sure of is the engine did not need motor oil added. If they will lie and cheat on a small thing as charging for a quart of oil that is not needed what else will they do to increase the revenue brought to there shop?
comments